John Parish — Three Hours
Album: The Endless Coloured Ways: The Songs of Nick DrakeAvg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 1550
Length: 4:27
Plays (last 30 days): 7
share
tweet
Three hours from sundown
Jeremy flies
Hoping to keep
The sun from his eyes
East from the city
And down to the cave
In search of a master
In search of a slave
Three hours from London
Giacomo's free
Taking his woes
Down to the sea
In search of a lifetime
To tell when he's home
In search of a story
That's never been known
Three hours from speaking
Everyone's flown
Not wanting to be
Seen on their own
Three hours is needed
To leave from them all
Three hours to wonder
Three hours to fall
Jeremy flies
Hoping to keep
The sun from his eyes
East from the city
And down to the cave
In search of a master
In search of a slave
Three hours from London
Giacomo's free
Taking his woes
Down to the sea
In search of a lifetime
To tell when he's home
In search of a story
That's never been known
Three hours from speaking
Everyone's flown
Not wanting to be
Seen on their own
Three hours is needed
To leave from them all
Three hours to wonder
Three hours to fall
Comments (58)add comment
John Parish worked on the very cool Eels Souljacker album. I've got to give him a tip of the cap for that alone.
Ipse_Dixit wrote:
8 for me. great treatment of great material
Arresting harmonies and a good beat. A solid 7.
8 for me. great treatment of great material
Grayson wrote:
I would prefer the option to judge them on a case by case basis. Andy Bey's excellent cover of river man for example - I would not proscribe that.
There should be a law banning ALL Nick Drake covers. This is a crime against the legacy. Make it stop! 
I would prefer the option to judge them on a case by case basis. Andy Bey's excellent cover of river man for example - I would not proscribe that.
Got to see him on PJ Harvey's recent tour - what a show! Go if you can.
One of the better efforts on this covers album. I think this track stands up well even if folks haven't heard the Nick Drake original.
Grayson wrote:
Ilona Knopfler does IMHO a very good cover of River Man. Give it a listen.
After one listen, I'll start this one out at a 7 (the original is of course a 10).
I'd never heard a Nick Drake cover. The very thought of one is an abomination. But if this had been played in an 80s discotheque, I'd have danced to it.
Ilona Knopfler does IMHO a very good cover of River Man. Give it a listen.
After one listen, I'll start this one out at a 7 (the original is of course a 10).
Ai laikit
ice-9 wrote:
You can be less douchy (I guess) but don't leave only positive reviews. I'm sick of all the cheerleaders in these comments beating down people who have every right to express an opinion about the music the don't like too. Any shitty song they choose to play on this station (we know most of them aren't, of course) will inevitably have countless fawning accolades in the comments claiming genius, and anyone who dares call it out for being shitty is pilloried for being negative; told to keep their opinion to themselves and PSD. They don't realize how negative THEY make the comments, by seeking to eliminate opinions they don't agree with. By not wanting it to be inclusive. And I listen to the stream on a player, so PSD isn't an option.
As for this song, it's funky and weird, and therefore I'd say it has a worthy place on RP, but yeah, I can't really argue with someone who thinks it should be nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Now watch the @$$holes thumb-down my comment, like clockwork...
Actually, your comment is quite compelling. It contains a strong argument for negative comments on songs (inclusiveness) and against negative comments on comments (nourishing negativity). So thanks for that.
That said, negative comments on songs are rarely as entertaining as "should be nuked from space" which has a hyperbolic humor in it that helps, or should help, swallow the comment in case you don't agree. It is clear, and it's funny, imho. Someone put a little thought in what to say and how to say it. Your average 'this is shite', 'I hate Radiohead', 'Bill you shouldn't play this', 'PSD' are a waste of everyone's brain-time, and I think that's why many listeners feel negative about negative comments. They are often wholly empty, even if they are someone's opinion that should be included. Granted, the same goes for senseless cheerleading that shuns anyone who does not agree.
So, I guess we'd all be better off when, if you have something to say, you put a little effort into saying it, and don't just blurt out a fart in one direction or another.
As far as the song goes, no problem with the nuking. Perhaps he should just stick to PJH's side, their collaborations generally receive straight 8's from me.
You can be less douchy (I guess) but don't leave only positive reviews. I'm sick of all the cheerleaders in these comments beating down people who have every right to express an opinion about the music the don't like too. Any shitty song they choose to play on this station (we know most of them aren't, of course) will inevitably have countless fawning accolades in the comments claiming genius, and anyone who dares call it out for being shitty is pilloried for being negative; told to keep their opinion to themselves and PSD. They don't realize how negative THEY make the comments, by seeking to eliminate opinions they don't agree with. By not wanting it to be inclusive. And I listen to the stream on a player, so PSD isn't an option.
As for this song, it's funky and weird, and therefore I'd say it has a worthy place on RP, but yeah, I can't really argue with someone who thinks it should be nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Now watch the @$$holes thumb-down my comment, like clockwork...
Actually, your comment is quite compelling. It contains a strong argument for negative comments on songs (inclusiveness) and against negative comments on comments (nourishing negativity). So thanks for that.
That said, negative comments on songs are rarely as entertaining as "should be nuked from space" which has a hyperbolic humor in it that helps, or should help, swallow the comment in case you don't agree. It is clear, and it's funny, imho. Someone put a little thought in what to say and how to say it. Your average 'this is shite', 'I hate Radiohead', 'Bill you shouldn't play this', 'PSD' are a waste of everyone's brain-time, and I think that's why many listeners feel negative about negative comments. They are often wholly empty, even if they are someone's opinion that should be included. Granted, the same goes for senseless cheerleading that shuns anyone who does not agree.
So, I guess we'd all be better off when, if you have something to say, you put a little effort into saying it, and don't just blurt out a fart in one direction or another.
As far as the song goes, no problem with the nuking. Perhaps he should just stick to PJH's side, their collaborations generally receive straight 8's from me.
Kinda feeling a Yo Lo Tengo vibe with this one.
This music reminds me very much of Sleaford Mods.
There should be a law banning ALL Nick Drake covers. This is a crime against the legacy. Make it stop!
Appreciate the creativity. But not my preference.
This song does catch my ear, and i do like it.
But having read some of the comments, enough to find out that it's a cover of a Nick Drake song, the original of which i had never heard, i went in search of it.
So if you're like i was, and you're wondering what the original sounds like, it's here -
Three Hours - Nick Drake
But having read some of the comments, enough to find out that it's a cover of a Nick Drake song, the original of which i had never heard, i went in search of it.
So if you're like i was, and you're wondering what the original sounds like, it's here -
Three Hours - Nick Drake
Ok, this is a no from me, dawg...
I think it is the near-robotic drum beat.
Not gonna poo-poo it. Just not for me.
I think it is the near-robotic drum beat.
Not gonna poo-poo it. Just not for me.
I really don’t understand that someone covers this song
Running RP in the background an working feverishly until this song cuts through and I need to see who is making this happen.. Go figure its one of my favourite quirky artists covering one of the greatest quirky artists. Awesome!
I’m sorry, but this is just so mediocre. The opening drums are uneven, the singing thin and wan. So little to make it interesting. The original is so much better.
I prefer the original, but I commend the artists for trying something different.
alvivino wrote:
I wish I could click a button that released a boxing glove on a spring from whatever device you wrote this comment on. As it is, I'll have to settle for a thumbs down.
Oh I get it now. Nick Drake should have just written songs for other artists and not performed them himself.
I wish I could click a button that released a boxing glove on a spring from whatever device you wrote this comment on. As it is, I'll have to settle for a thumbs down.
Oh I get it now. Nick Drake should have just written songs for other artists and not performed them himself.
This is fantastic !!!
smartn1 wrote:
I doubt it's cheaper, but even if it was, I'm sure that is very low on William's priority list. it is simply that William has a thing for covers. He enjoys them and it is kinda fun (usually).
too many covers RP - I get it -probably cheaper to license
Is this technically a cover or a remix? I can't quite tell.
I doubt it's cheaper, but even if it was, I'm sure that is very low on William's priority list. it is simply that William has a thing for covers. He enjoys them and it is kinda fun (usually).
sajitjacob wrote:
Not a Drake follower at all but, reading the comments urged me to pause and, get a listen to Nicks version. Myself, I highly prefer J. Parish's version. The way Parish & accompaniment perform it.... Seem far more "suitable" to the lyrics. IMHO, of course! Too much "going on" in Nicks version and, his voice doesn't seem to suit the lyrics or, vice - versa.
I've always found Nick Drake boring, but John Parish gives it a nice lift.
smartn1 wrote:
And having Williams "expertise" in selecting particular covers is a problem, why? Not only do they "fit" into the "eclectic" category, I think it's quite interesting to hear an artist "pay homage" to the original, by doing it in their own fashion! This J. Parish & co version, I find much "cleaner" than Nicks.
too many covers RP - I get it -probably cheaper to license
Is this technically a cover or a remix? I can't quite tell.
Being that, after just now listening to Nick Drake's version for 1st time, all I can say is, Nicks version 1) seems a bit too "involved" and, 2) either the music doesn't "fit" his voice or, his voice don't fit the lyrics... Not sure which. However, Parish's version sounds like it was created to be sung, just as he has done... accompaniment included. Very "relaxing" feel to it.
Grayson wrote:
I kinda get what you're saying but, seems to be a bit redundant. Why you would think another artist doing a cover is an abomination seems a bit judgemental and, even a bit harsh to speak on it negatively. You're certainly entitled to your opinion but, IMHO, I think it sounds great, if not a bit to short!
I'd never heard a Nick Drake cover. The very thought of one is an abomination. But if this had been played in an 80s discotheque, I'd have danced to it.
ice-9 wrote:
You can be less douchy (I guess) but don't leave only positive reviews. I'm sick of all the cheerleaders in these comments beating down people who have every right to express an opinion about the music the don't like too. Any shitty song they choose to play on this station (we know most of them aren't, of course) will inevitably have countless fawning accolades in the comments claiming genius, and anyone who dares call it out for being shitty is pilloried for being negative; told to keep their opinion to themselves and PSD. They don't realize how negative THEY make the comments, by seeking to eliminate opinions they don't agree with. By not wanting it to be inclusive. And I listen to the stream on a player, so PSD isn't an option.
As for this song, it's funky and weird, and therefore I'd say it has a worthy place on RP, but yeah, I can't really argue with someone who thinks it should be nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Now watch the @$$holes thumb-down my comment, like clockwork...
Actually, I truly enjoyed reading your input! You make a solid, valid point!
You can be less douchy (I guess) but don't leave only positive reviews. I'm sick of all the cheerleaders in these comments beating down people who have every right to express an opinion about the music the don't like too. Any shitty song they choose to play on this station (we know most of them aren't, of course) will inevitably have countless fawning accolades in the comments claiming genius, and anyone who dares call it out for being shitty is pilloried for being negative; told to keep their opinion to themselves and PSD. They don't realize how negative THEY make the comments, by seeking to eliminate opinions they don't agree with. By not wanting it to be inclusive. And I listen to the stream on a player, so PSD isn't an option.
As for this song, it's funky and weird, and therefore I'd say it has a worthy place on RP, but yeah, I can't really argue with someone who thinks it should be nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Now watch the @$$holes thumb-down my comment, like clockwork...
h9xh9xh9x wrote:
I like your "rating" methodology!
100 out of 10 💙
too many covers RP - I get it -probably cheaper to license
Is this technically a cover or a remix? I can't quite tell.
Is this technically a cover or a remix? I can't quite tell.
Edweirdo wrote:
You can be less douchy (I guess) but don't leave only positive reviews. I'm sick of all the cheerleaders in these comments beating down people who have every right to express an opinion about the music the don't like too. Any shitty song they choose to play on this station (we know most of them aren't, of course) will inevitably have countless fawning accolades in the comments claiming genius, and anyone who dares call it out for being shitty is pilloried for being negative; told to keep their opinion to themselves and PSD. They don't realize how negative THEY make the comments, by seeking to eliminate opinions they don't agree with. By not wanting it to be inclusive. And I listen to the stream on a player, so PSD isn't an option.
As for this song, it's funky and weird, and therefore I'd say it has a worthy place on RP, but yeah, I can't really argue with someone who thinks it should be nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Now watch the @$$holes thumb-down my comment, like clockwork...
I'm trying to be less douche-y in my comments, only leaving positive reviews and just PSD-ing when I don't like it. But I have to say that this is an absolute travesty and should have been nuked from space.
You can be less douchy (I guess) but don't leave only positive reviews. I'm sick of all the cheerleaders in these comments beating down people who have every right to express an opinion about the music the don't like too. Any shitty song they choose to play on this station (we know most of them aren't, of course) will inevitably have countless fawning accolades in the comments claiming genius, and anyone who dares call it out for being shitty is pilloried for being negative; told to keep their opinion to themselves and PSD. They don't realize how negative THEY make the comments, by seeking to eliminate opinions they don't agree with. By not wanting it to be inclusive. And I listen to the stream on a player, so PSD isn't an option.
As for this song, it's funky and weird, and therefore I'd say it has a worthy place on RP, but yeah, I can't really argue with someone who thinks it should be nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Now watch the @$$holes thumb-down my comment, like clockwork...
Edweirdo wrote:
That you, Ripley?
I'm trying to be less douche-y in my comments, only leaving positive reviews and just PSD-ing when I don't like it. But I have to say that this is an absolute travesty and should have been nuked from space.
That you, Ripley?
Edweirdo wrote:
I wouldn't go as far as nuking it, but it doesn't DO anything - apart from repeat itself.
Changing behaviour is a process. Baby steps,
I'm trying to be less douche-y in my comments, only leaving positive reviews and just PSD-ing when I don't like it. But I have to say that this is an absolute travesty and should have been nuked from space.
I wouldn't go as far as nuking it, but it doesn't DO anything - apart from repeat itself.
Changing behaviour is a process. Baby steps,
I'm trying to be less douche-y in my comments, only leaving positive reviews and just PSD-ing when I don't like it. But I have to say that this is an absolute travesty and should have been nuked from space.
Grammarcop wrote:
The song is only about four and a half minutes long. It just feels like three hours.
The song is only about four and a half minutes long. It just feels like three hours.
Very much sounded to me like it might be a work of Jose Gonzalez and Junip until I checked...there are some Interesting sounds indeed in there, Captain...although I logically prefer Nick's original...
Settled into a solid "8" now. This always grabs my attention and brings curiosity and intrigue.
ScottishWillie wrote:
I'm in on the second listen.
Interesting cover! Not sure if I like it yet, but hopefully, it'll get lots of plays on RP to help me decide.
I'm in on the second listen.
Fyeah, right up my alley
Hearing this far too frequently... seems daily.
I had to turn it off and go listen to Nick's original version on YouTube.
Not really sure why...
Not really sure why...
ScottishWillie wrote:
I've decided I definitely like it! I always find Aldous Harding's voice to be a bit creepy and jarring (in a good way), and for me, her vocals really make this song work.
Interesting cover! I'm not sure if I like it yet, but hopefully, it'll get lots of plays on RP to help me decide.
I've decided I definitely like it! I always find Aldous Harding's voice to be a bit creepy and jarring (in a good way), and for me, her vocals really make this song work.
The vocal parts seem soothingly close to the original while that melodic " hook ?" and the up tempo beat all add up to very worthy re- working. IMHO not all the versions on the album pass the tests for a good cover. As is usual the rp team have extracted the essence of new art for our grateful ears to enjoy.
Grayson wrote:
Jose Gonzalez does an excellent Cello Song cover
I'd never heard a Nick Drake cover. The very thought of one is an abomination. But if this had been played in an 80s discotheque, I'd have danced to it.
Jose Gonzalez does an excellent Cello Song cover
I've always found Nick Drake boring, but John Parish gives it a nice lift.
Dat bassline.
Kinda chirpy version of this song.
I do like it.
I do like it.
I'd never heard a Nick Drake cover. The very thought of one is an abomination. But if this had been played in an 80s discotheque, I'd have danced to it.
So... this isn't the intro for a Death Cab track? 
Slow ride, take it easy...
Interesting cover! Not sure if I like it yet, but hopefully, it'll get lots of plays on RP to help me decide.
VERY cool. New to me. Sounds just like PJ with him, but must be Aldous. Also has a little Wire feel to it.
Arresting harmonies and a good beat. A solid 7.
Fishman wrote:
It's Aldous Harding.
https://www.discogs.com/master...
Never been first to comment. Only like to say positive things about the good humans who make music. So sounds pretty good for driving long stretches. BTW who's the singer?
It's Aldous Harding.
https://www.discogs.com/master...
Fishman wrote:
I believe it is Aldous Harding
https://musicfeeds.com.au/news...
Never been first to comment. Only like to say positive things about the good humans who make music. So sounds pretty good for driving long stretches. BTW who's the singer?
I believe it is Aldous Harding
https://musicfeeds.com.au/news...
I like it.
Never been first to comment. Only like to say positive things about the good humans who make music. So sounds pretty good for driving long stretches. BTW who's the singer?
(Kidsmoke)