Warning: file_get_contents(/home/www/settings/mirror_forum_db_enable_sql): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/content/Forum/functions.php on line 8
And, as a defensive tactic that the media should be using, put a man in the interviewer chair - not because women arenât good at it, but because the dynamic would be totally different. Preferably a large, âHe-manâ that would be the kind you canât stare down. Think this through, folks.
Yeah, I don't think Donnie would throw a hissy fit at Bret Baier. Unfortunately, Bret's a company man who'd never confront Drumpf.
As much as many of us would like to simply submit âFDT,â comments are far more likely to be considered if they raise specific concerns about the project. Federal agencies are only required to consider substantive comments,so weâll be sharing a list of talking points that address issues such as public access, costs, environmental impacts, historic preservation, and alternatives.
Talking points:
The arch would permanently disrupt the historic sightline connecting the Lincoln Memorial, Arlington Memorial Bridge, Arlington National Cemetery, and Arlington House.
At roughly 250 feet tall, the structure would dominate the surrounding memorial landscape and compete with existing monuments for visual prominence.
Arlington National Cemetery is a sacred place of remembrance, and a massive ceremonial gateway risks undermining the solemn character of the site.
The National Park Service should fully evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including smaller designs or different locations.
The project could permanently alter a nationally significant historic and cultural landscape that cannot easily be restored once changed.
It's also an added danger to an already congested flight zone.
As much as many of us would like to simply submit âFDT,â comments are far more likely to be considered if they raise specific concerns about the project. Federal agencies are only required to consider substantive comments,so weâll be sharing a list of talking points that address issues such as public access, costs, environmental impacts, historic preservation, and alternatives.
Talking points:
The arch would permanently disrupt the historic sightline connecting the Lincoln Memorial, Arlington Memorial Bridge, Arlington National Cemetery, and Arlington House.
At roughly 250 feet tall, the structure would dominate the surrounding memorial landscape and compete with existing monuments for visual prominence.
Arlington National Cemetery is a sacred place of remembrance, and a massive ceremonial gateway risks undermining the solemn character of the site.
The National Park Service should fully evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including smaller designs or different locations.
The project could permanently alter a nationally significant historic and cultural landscape that cannot easily be restored once changed.
As much as many of us would like to simply submit âFDT,â comments are far more likely to be considered if they raise specific concerns about the project. Federal agencies are only required to consider substantive comments,so weâll be sharing a list of talking points that address issues such as public access, costs, environmental impacts, historic preservation, and alternatives.
Talking points:
The arch would permanently disrupt the historic sightline connecting the Lincoln Memorial, Arlington Memorial Bridge, Arlington National Cemetery, and Arlington House.
At roughly 250 feet tall, the structure would dominate the surrounding memorial landscape and compete with existing monuments for visual prominence.
Arlington National Cemetery is a sacred place of remembrance, and a massive ceremonial gateway risks undermining the solemn character of the site.
The National Park Service should fully evaluate less intrusive alternatives, including smaller designs or different locations.
The project could permanently alter a nationally significant historic and cultural landscape that cannot easily be restored once changed.
Location: At the dude ranch / above the sea Gender:
Posted:
Jun 8, 2026 - 8:38am
rgio wrote:
The question for the Right now is will there be a "George Clooney moment" for them, and if so, would Fox cut bait and turn on the President as a way to remain "journalisticly relevant" past 2028.
The ratings are trending south and the show has been renewed for 2 more seasons.... so when do they start promoting the new lineup?
The goal is for the GOP to realize that being attached to him is bad for their brand/future.
Location: At the dude ranch / above the sea Gender:
Posted:
Jun 8, 2026 - 8:37am
Red_Dragon wrote:
Truly presidential performance on Meet The Press this morning. What a fucking child.
And, as a defensive tactic that the media should be using, put a man in the interviewer chair - not because women arenât good at it, but because the dynamic would be totally different. Preferably a large, âHe-manâ that would be the kind you canât stare down. Think this through, folks.
He looked desperate and tired. Everyone knows and sees through his Gish Gallop tactic to avoid answering tough questions. He has to keep accusing the reporter of lies and corruption to push down the knowledge that he's the liar, fraud and criminal. And once again, he runs away from the interview.
So many of his accusations are confessions.
The question for the Right now is will there be a "George Clooney moment" for them, and if so, would Fox cut bait and turn on the President as a way to remain "journalisticly relevant" past 2028.
The ratings are trending south and the show has been renewed for 2 more seasons.... so when do they start promoting the new lineup?
He looked desperate and tired. Everyone knows and sees through his Gish Gallop tactic to avoid answering tough questions. He has to keep accusing the reporter of lies and corruption to push down the knowledge that he's the liar, fraud and criminal. And once again, he runs away from the interview.
So many of his accusations are confessions.
EXACTLY!
He crouches forward and waves/points his hands at the person who threatens him, he's perspiring and spewing while barking slurs that most definitely are signals of HIM HATING HIMSELF AND HE NEEDS TO RUN OFF TO THROW SOME BIG MACS AT A GILDED MIRROR. He must be locked up.
Truly presidential performance on Meet The Press this morning. What a fucking child.
He looked desperate and tired. Everyone knows and sees through his Gish Gallop tactic to avoid answering tough questions. He has to keep accusing the reporter of lies and corruption to push down the knowledge that he's the liar, fraud and criminal. And once again, he runs away from the interview.
I understand the frustration, but as you note, people used to accept that they didn't understand why the FDA was beneficial, and assumed that people in charge would "manage" it. It's why we elected smart people, who filled important jobs with other smart people.
Now, because you don't like the border policy and immigrants, you support the destruction of the environment, healthcare, the economy, and our global status and ally network while enabling unimaginable grift?
The support for things that are done with no justification, no logic, and no intellectual support.... isn't justified because you're mad about something.
FWIW... they (MAGA) know they've been played, and their middle finger to the world has gone into hiding. I ride a bike on a lot of "country" roads through NJ farm country, and the Trump support signs, banners, and front yard statements of defiance are gone. We all knew they were assholes when they put them up. Now they all know they were assholes too. They won't say it out loud... but the majority of them know they were taken in by the con man.
Maybe, but I'll reserve my judgement of them until I see how they vote. I'm betting they will vote for some flavor of "more of the same please, but with cover for the previous mistakes".
It's not even in isolation, it's just a lack of critical thinking. "why are we spending money in Panama?" - they can't even see the chain of events, now Texas cattle ranchers will suffer, which will cause all American beef consumers to suffer.
A bunch of people mad at government, even though government was making their lives better in demonstratable ways. Many are to arrogant to try an unwind the problem they created and will now suffer for it. The bad part is now we will all suffer along with them.And most will be mad that we didn't understand why they were mad to start with.
It's time to divide up the country.
I understand the frustration, but as you note, people used to accept that they didn't understand why the FDA was beneficial, and assumed that people in charge would "manage" it. It's why we elected smart people, who filled important jobs with other smart people.
Now, because you don't like the border policy and immigrants, you support the destruction of the environment, healthcare, the economy, and our global status and ally network while enabling unimaginable grift?
The support for things that are done with no justification, no logic, and no intellectual support.... isn't justified because you're mad about something.
FWIW... they (MAGA) know they've been played, and their middle finger to the world has gone into hiding. I ride a bike on a lot of "country" roads through NJ farm country, and the Trump support signs, banners, and front yard statements of defiance are gone. We all knew they were assholes when they put them up. Now they all know they were assholes too. They won't say it out loud... but the majority of them know they were taken in by the con man.
This is what happens when every action is taken in isolation.
Smaller government... good... save $1
Fewer dollars spent on government programs...good... save another $1
Outbreak of something we had under control for $2... costs you $10... blame Joe Biden, Barack Obama, Bill Clinton.
The destruction of the US by the "Make America Great" crowd is one of the colossal fuck ups in world history, which will be written over decades.
To save money, we stopped paying the electric bill, and are only now beginning to realize we were living on a respirator.
It's not even in isolation, it's just a lack of critical thinking. "why are we spending money in Panama?" - they can't even see the chain of events, now Texas cattle ranchers will suffer, which will cause all American beef consumers to suffer.
A bunch of people mad at government, even though government was making their lives better in demonstratable ways. Many are to arrogant to try an unwind the problem they created and will now suffer for it. The bad part is now we will all suffer along with them. And most will be mad that we didn't understand why they were mad to start with.
