Avg rating:
Your rating:
Total ratings: 2138
Length: 5:03
Plays (last 30 days): 0
And one pill makes you small
And the ones that mother gives you
Don't do anything at all
Go ask Alice when she's ten feet tall
And if you go chasing rabbits
And you know you're going to fall
Tell him a hookah-smokin' caterpillar
Has given you the call
And call Alice when she was just small
When the men on the chessboard
Get up and tell you where to go
And you have just have some kind of mushroom
And your mind is movin' low
Go ask Alice, I think she'll know
When logic and proportion
Have fallen sloppy dead
And the white knight is talking backwards
And the red queen's off with her head
Remember
What the dormouse said
Feed your head
Feed your head
Fun fact; Rabbits are an invention of the Illuminati, designed to spread fear and loathing of meat, so you turn to Genetically Modified vegetables that contain sedatives and trackers.
Feed you head! wake up sheeple.
;-)
I'll have what he's having please
Jefferson Airplane meets Battlestar Galactica
OK - My favorite RP comment so far!!
She's got a better voice than Grace Slick.
But did she write on of best songs ever made, uh NO. The original is like a gut punch and it should be. I guess you had to be alive then to understand.
Sounds like the Mickey Mouse Club discovered LSD.
Ha Ha Ha, you just made my Day, THANKS!!!!
I like it, in part because, despite its historic significance in popular culture, the original is not something I enjoy hearing anymore. One of the drawbacks of modern civilization is the astonishingly easy access to almost everything that has ever been written, performed, drawn, etc. On the one hand, this gives easy access to the types of things that once were reserved for elites. On the other hand, there is a numbing effect that comes from gross over-exposure. This plays out in the comments sections here, when listeners complain that RP is playing something that is overplayed on commercial radio. The irony is that much of this music was seen as breakthrough material when it was new. The easy retort is: stop listening to those other stations. But, who can stop the endless barrage of piped in, or otherwise narrow casts, of music from the past 50 years. And my point is? The Grace Slick performance is fine, but after a half century or so, maybe another take on the song is not unwelcome.
The overexposure of a song is what I call "Mull of Kintyre syndrome"
My 2 cents. A yawner version of a great old classic. Brought nothing interesting or new to this version
I think the music is more complex and a lot better, for the most part.
One of my favorites, slipping periodically from reality to fantasy and back ... like what happens every day around here.
I like how she knows no one can do Grace Slick except Grace, and she makes it her own without straying from the power and sinister intensity of the original. I love her other songs, too. A real talent!
I agree... been an Emiliana fan for a long time... love her!
b. I wish Emiliana had put some more passion into it
Grace performed this song, Emiliana merely sung it (very well for singing) but without emotion.
Grace is a really tough act to follow.
Now hearing all the emotion in "Somebody to Love" affirms my assessment.
Love Emilíana Torrini - worth checking out her album Love in the Time of Science
I echo this... Emiliana is great!
I like it, in part because, despite its historic significance in popular culture, the original is not something I enjoy hearing anymore. One of the drawbacks of modern civilization is the astonishingly easy access to almost everything that has ever been written, performed, drawn, etc. On the one hand, this gives easy access to the types of things that once were reserved for elites. On the other hand, there is a numbing effect that comes from gross over-exposure. This plays out in the comments sections here, when listeners complain that RP is playing something that is overplayed on commercial radio. The irony is that much of this music was seen as breakthrough material when it was new. The easy retort is: stop listening to those other stations. But, who can stop the endless barrage of piped in, or otherwise narrow casts, of music from the past 50 years. And my point is? The Grace Slick performance is fine, but after a half century or so, maybe another take on the song is not unwelcome.
Beautiful!
looked for it and don't see them doing it, maybe Patti Smith's
I like it simply because I've not heard anything other than the original of this song - I've never once heard it covered.
Actually, you have...The Jefferson Airplane (with Grace Slick) is a cover
of White Rabbit done by The Great Society (with Grace Slick) a year or
so earlier...The Great Society (with Grace Slick) also do a great cover of
Sally Go 'Round the Roses...
Tony in NJ
W.A.S.T.E.
I like it simply because I've not heard anything other than the original of this song - I've never once heard it covered.
Actually, the Airplane's White Rabbit is Grace Slick doing a cover of her-
self...The original was by Slick when she was with The Great Society...
Tony in NJ
W.A.S.T.E.
Never heard of the film, but I like the White Rabbit version.
Just bought the dvd on ebay. At £1.50, got to be worth a punt.
I watched it on Netflix and think you've probably wasted your cash...
How do rabbits spread fear and loathing of meat?
Rabbit Starvation/Poisoning
so add fat!
Fun fact; Rabbits are an invention of the Illuminati, designed to spread fear and loathing of meat, so you turn to Genetically Modified vegetables that contain sedatives and trackers.
Feed you head! wake up sheeple.
;-)
How do rabbits spread fear and loathing of meat?
I agree in principle, but geez, Louise, do something new with it.
It's twice as long. Lots of new stuff going on in those extra minutes.
Just bought the dvd on ebay. At £1.50, got to be worth a punt.
Bill summarizing, what RADIO PARADISE is about and why I love it.
Many songs here make me happy right away, very few make me use the psd button... and some grew on me and made me realize that there is so much more to discover!
I love this - exactly what a cover should do: pay homage, bring something new (energy, weirdness, magnificent musicianship), and do no harm. Check, check, check. As always, thx Bill
I've nowt against covers, and this isn't bad, but it doesn't give me shivers as Grace Slick does. It's also out of time as kids don't do trippy drugs these day. Ok but not memorable. Maybe it works fine in the context of the film.
I agree in principle, but geez, Louise, do something new with it. Joe Cocker was a master at reinterpreting Beatles classics into new classics, but just re-singing a classic note-for-note only invites a failing comparison to the original. I'm also thinking about recent covers of Because the Night and Turn the Page which really did not need to be recorded because they were only weak retreads of the classic originals.
Dolly Parton's cover of Heaven Let Your Light Shine Down and Johnny Cash's Hurt are two other good examples of a complete retake, making each song very much their own.
This one? Meh. Not impressed.
I'd go along with that. Cocker's renditions often took the song in a different direction; sometimes even better. It may be in the modern idiom as some have commented, but for me it lacks that something that Grace + Airplane offered. Oh, and it has too much percussion drowning out other instruments.
I - really detested the original - just always grated on my nerves - I heard this on RP today for the first time - and really like this This woman sounds amazing and fits the song just right thank you for providing a way for me to enjoy a clssic
I've always loved the original, especially it's role in the film "Fear and Loathing..."
This one is freaking awesome!! +2 to 9 for amazing production and the outro rocks extra good shit right into some Somebody to Love!!
LLRP
Feed you head! wake up sheeple.
;-)
This version is nice but hard to replicate the power of Grace's voice.
I have that album. It was one of the first two albums I ever bought and it was for the long versions of WR and STL. The other album I bought with that was Iron Butterfly ~ Heavy. Still have both.
I don't mind this version, gave it a 7.
I agree in principle, but geez, Louise, do something new with it. Joe Cocker was a master at reinterpreting Beatles classics into new classics, but just re-singing a classic note-for-note only invites a failing comparison to the original. I'm also thinking about recent covers of Because the Night and Turn the Page which really did not need to be recorded because they were only weak retreads of the classic originals.
Dolly Parton's cover of Heaven Let Your Light Shine Down and Johnny Cash's Hurt are two other good examples of a complete retake, making each song very much their own.
This one? Meh. Not impressed.
I think that the original is so short, that covering this song and letting the song "stretch its legs" is a good thing. The music of the original is great, but it never gets much time to shine due to the lyrics and short length.
A live, original version by The Great Society has long guitar-based intro which stretches the song is floating around. My favorite version.
This version is nice but hard to replicate the power of Grace's voice.
I think that the original is so short, that covering this song and letting the song "stretch its legs" is a good thing. The music of the original is great, but it never gets much time to shine due to the lyrics and short length.
I agree with your point, but I would like to add to it. I loved the Beatles growing up, but after several decades of heavy rotations of Beatles music everywhere I turned, I had to block them out for awhile. I turned the station every time a Beatles song came on. I went on like this for a decade or so, and then I started listening to them again (in measured doses) and realized that I could appreciate them again. Actually, with the passage of time, I was coming to their music with a different life perspective and it allowed me to hear things in their music that I never heard before.
Classics beg on their knees to be messed with. But not just anybody can (or even should), and this version is a perfect example for what I mean.
Only if love is a drug.
You are so very wrong. I like it. A unique original, updated into the 21st Century.
BTW, the movie (Sucker Punch) is an exercise in imagination that is well worth the time. Just be sure to buckle your mental seatbelt!
I highly encourage RP listeners to watch this movie. I believe most RP listeners have the imagination necessary to truly understand and enjoy this movie. This is a unique movie, and the take on this song is also unique.
I like this version featuring lead banjo.
Well-spoken!
Grace must - she's receiving royalty checks for it.
OK, joking. I'm good with this.
Saw Jefferson Airplane play this live a few years back... they did a perfunctory version of it. I think it's okay for others to take a swing at it.
Took the words right out of my keyboard. If you're going to take the time to do a cover, make it different enough to justify its existence.
The Cranberries could have done a good version of this, bless her.
I quite enjoy this remake (the film was *meh*). But yeah, as far as the original being a "magnitude higher"... seek out the version that is Grace Slick's vocal track alone; no other instrumentation. When you hear her in her sonic glory it's easy to understand that no one is ever going to do a cover that surpasses, or even equals, the original. But I'm all for folk giving it a try.
That was... stunning. I agree with the poster who wrote:
This is why the ancients warned about Sirens.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyMtIwobqbI
I quite enjoy this remake (the film was *meh*). But yeah, as far as the original being a "magnitude higher"... seek out the version that is Grace Slick's vocal track alone; no other instrumentation. When you hear her in her sonic glory it's easy to understand that no one is ever going to do a cover that surpasses, or even equals, the original. But I'm all for folk giving it a try.
Wow... a quick google and I found the pure vocal. Thanks for the idea!
I quite enjoy this remake (the film was *meh*). But yeah, as far as the original being a "magnitude higher"... seek out the version that is Grace Slick's vocal track alone; no other instrumentation. When you hear her in her sonic glory it's easy to understand that no one is ever going to do a cover that surpasses, or even equals, the original. But I'm all for folk giving it a try.
This doesn't bring a new interpretation of the song or add anything apart from a lot of cheesy orchestration.
You are so very wrong. I like it. A unique original, updated into the 21st Century.
BTW, the movie (Sucker Punch) is an exercise in imagination that is well worth the time. Just be sure to buckle your mental seatbelt!
For those who fight for it, life has a flavor the sheltered will never know.
This version - sure, why not! 7 or 8... mostly on the merit of the song itself.
I'm going 5 to 7 today, I like how trippy the song sounds, her voice is perfect for the ethereal feeling, so yeah....7 it is (and still waiting to see if my wife likes it!) Long Live RP!!
I suppose most vocalists pale when compared to Grace Slick when it comes to power (except maybe Freddy Mercury).
I guess I’m also not a big fan of the way that they’ve suppressed the Bolero-esqe snare. It provides a sense of tension and urgency that’s just not present in the remake, which seems to focus mostly on the bass line.